Pics
http://tinypic.com/r/2meo20g/8

http://tinypic.com/r/acd3ps/8

quote:

---

Originally posted by pgrieco:
I'm far from an expert on this so I may be wrong, but it looks like it was damaged by being stored someplace with high heat and humidity.

---

Yeah, but that's the thing, I know what moisture damage looks like and that wrinkles the card. These spots are perfectly smooth, it's only noticeable at angle in bright light.

quote:

---

Originally posted by walkerdog:
moisture and humidity/heat aren't going to look the same. For reference, try suspending a common in a sealed Jar, with a pool of water in the bottom, and leaving it in the window, so the card isn't touching the water.

Then look at it after a couple week compared to a common you leave a nice drop of water/pop/whatever on for a day or two. The "humidity simulation" will likely look like your card all over - it's possible that it was in a humid location, but just that part of the card had sunlight directly on it, I guess, which might account for the focused aspect of the mark.

---

Shouldn't humidity still distort the surface, or warp/bend the card? The surface is as flat and shiny as the rest of the card, and as for the sunlight theory its in the exact same spot on both sides of the card.

quote:

---

Originally posted by paragondave:
I've seen this on several older cards, especially from Legends and Mirage. I'm sure it's a printing issue. It shouldn't detract from condition. I'd call that card strict NM.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwiz:
This card has damage on all 4 corners. How can it possibly be considered NM. Just because it's from 1994 doesn't make it NM. It isn't a sliding scale.

---

Then what condition would you call it?

__________________
"Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondon

Have a feeling it would be 7-8 for PSA grading.